We all cherish freedom; it is a major factor among those
that define happiness. Otherwise why would we take freedom away from a criminal
as a way of punishing him? Why would citizens living under an oppressive
government rebel?
However, one does not have to be a criminal or live in an
oppressive country to experience the challenges of not being free, or the joy
of freedom. We all have restrictions on what we are or not able to do at any
stage of life.
If you take a simplistic viewpoint, there are five factors
that define personal freedom: Financial ability, physical ability, available
free time, dependency on others, and others dependent on you. These factors
change over lifetime.
Unless you are born in a rich family, the financial ability
rises over time, reaching the peak as you retire. If you have planned your finances
carefully, the financial ability continues through retirement.
The physical ability starts out being low, reaches a peak in
your twenties and then goes through a slow decline the rest of your life
(depressing). The availability of free time starts out high but then starts
declining, reaching a bottom when you hit middle age. It rises again as you
retire, staying high for the rest of your life.
Dependency on others also curtails freedom. It begins low
(low=dependent) as you start your life, and are dependent on your parents. It
also ends on a low note toward the later years as you become dependent on others,
most likely your children. Finally, if you are taking care of others, whether
it is your children or your parents, there is some curtailment of your freedom.
That comes in two phases, one initially, when you are taking care of your
children, the other when you hit your middle age and are taking care of
parents.
We can combine all these factors and create a “Freedom
Index” that indicate how free we are at different stages of life. I have done
that by assigning values zero to ten for the first three factors (financial
ability, physical ability, and availability of free time), and from minus ten
to zero for the last two (dependency on others and others dependent on you). Then
I calculated “Freedom Index” by simply adding my estimated scores for all the
factors. Here are the results.
The Freedom Index thus calculated indicates that the best
time of your life from the perspective of freedom to do things is the 60s to
early 70s when you have the financial ability, physical ability, plenty of free
time and the absence of dependency, in both directions. These are the golden years. There are other times, such as your
early twenties, late forties, or the last few years of your life when there is
some freedom but because of one factor or another, not as much as during the
golden years.
This analysis gets really interesting if you consider that
people live longer than the mid eighties as I have assumed in the above
analysis. Let us see what happens if people live to mid-nighties, as is
becoming more common these days.
As can be seen, the extra decade thus lived is not
necessarily the one with most freedom. In fact, those years are likely to be
spent in being dependent on others. In addition, your financial ability may
also take a hit in that extra decade because you did not plan to live that
long.
Most importantly, the
arrival of extra long life creates a hit on your golden years because you end
up taking care of your parents for extra ten years and that period squarely coincides with time you are supposed to be
enjoying life to the fullest. The
period of maximum freedom, in that case reduces from fifteen years (as was the
case when people lived to mid-eighties) to five.
So, while we celebrate the fact that we all live longer, we need to be aware
that the quality of life gets sacrificed for quantity.
One needs to keep in mind that the above analysis is for freedom and not necessarily for happiness.
All of the factors in the above analysis, with the exception
of physical ability, have an ambiguous relationship with happiness. Money does
help, but not determine, how happy you are. So, it is with available time. For
some, that is a curse rather then blessing. Although they have time to do what
they want, having too much of it can bring unhappiness. Dependency on others
brings lack of freedom but also love and caring. The same is true, in reverse,
when you are taking care of someone. The lack of freedom is compensated by deep
satisfaction that comes with nurturing and having done ones duty.
Nice analysis. The conclusions that I draw from this article is that when you have the freedom, make the most of it; so that when you have lesser freedom there are fewer regrets. Also, knowing and acknowledging that there will be dependencies at various points, it is good if one can budget for these, so that one does not feel overwhelmed.
ReplyDeleteSo true, Nandita
ReplyDeleteExcellent analysis and I enjoyed your rankings. Many corollaries to your observations in the blog, apart from the two very good ones pointed out by the previous commenter. Here is one more, the further you live in your middle ages from where you were brought up as a dependent child, the greater the freedom. NRIs enjoy a huge degree of freedom in their 20s to 50s, compared to their counterparts or siblings in India.
DeleteGood observation Vijay. I am wondering if individuals can build their own analysis using the scaffolding I have provided.
Delete