Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Americanization

It was interesting to study the Indian response to what happened to Devyani Khobragade, an Indian diplomat, who was arrested on charges of paying her maid less than (much less than) the minimum wages and lying about it on her visa application. To an American, there was nothing unusual about the incidence---there are laws that apply to everyone, no matter what your status in the society, and if you break the law you are arrested. An arrest frequently involves handcuffing and if you are jailed after that, there is strip search.

To someone in India, this was outrageous. The crime was insignificant from an Indian perspective and the punishment was unusually harsh. In India one cannot imagine that a person of high standing in the society can be arrested in this manner and thrown in jail with other criminals. That is just not done.

Another point of outrage was a sense of betrayal---why would America do such thing to harm the relationship between two countries. This reaction was puzzling to Americans because in their black and white world of crime and punishment, such soft spots do not exist.

This was clearly a case of an incidence causing two totally different reactions based on an individual's culture and biases. That by itself was interesting but not as much as how the Indians living in US reacted to the incidence.

There were clearly two camps--- one that aligned itself to the Indian interpretation, the other to the American one. To me this brought to sharp relief that fact that the immigrant community is divided into two groups, each with its own values and culture. I would call them “Indians living in America” vs. “Americans with Indian heritage”.

The Indians living in America firmly believe that they are the custodians of their native identity. They are proud of their motherland and have a strong respect for its traditions. To them the Americans with Indian heritage have sold out to the West and are ashamed of being Indians.

On the other hand, the Americans with Indian heritage believe that they have assimilated well in their new land. They are able to look at things objectively without the emotional attachment to the past, and are willing to criticize and praise America in a balanced way. They think that by clinging on to the past, the Indians living in America have remained misfits, are ungrateful, and are missing out on opportunities (besides financial) offered by the West.

Of course, neither characterization of the other group by a member of one group is entirely true and can be insulting.

A great topic to investigate further is to study who amongst us belongs to which group. As one would expect, those who have been living in the US only for few years generally consider themselves as former--- Indians living in America. What is unexpected is that many who have lived here for decades also consider themselves being a member of the same group.  

I am struggling to understand what causes some immigrants to maintain their native land identity, even after living here for decades, while some others to change and join the mainstream Americans, or Americanize, as they like to say. This is clearly not based on success one has achieved in the US; many wealthy people still consider themselves Indians living in America. Nor is it based on level of education or profession. In fact, one finds that two persons with identical background and success history in US can belong to these two different groups. One of my friends, an American of Indian heritage, experienced this at an alumni reunion in which those on the Indian side of the above incidence, a majority, hounded and berated him as a “self-hating Indian.”

So, what makes some continue being Indians living in America and what prompted some of us to become Americans with Indian heritage?

I do not have the answer, but suspect that the following factors have played a role in how you identify yourself:

  •         The importance of the place you were born as a key component of your self-identity,
  •         The relative contribution of  “heart vs. mind” in your decision making,
  •        The environment you encountered after immigration---who you hung out with,
  •        The place where you currently live, and
  •        Your cohort group.


I am assuming that this will become a moot point, as the next generation takes over. They are almost certainly going to be Americans with Indian heritage.

Or are they?


7 comments:

  1. Hi Ashok, firstly, congrats on your 6 years of persistence with your blog. I am sure if one went through it chronologically one may get a good sweep of thought-provoking issues of these years.
    You have captured the perspectives surrounding the Khobragade incident very well.
    My own view is low 'self esteem' is a key factor responsible for extreme reactions of the type just seen. Also in my experience a majority of Indians suffer from low self-esteem, which makes them react with surprising agression when they feel they are individually or collectively mistreated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Kiran: I agree with you completely. That is my feeling too. The hostility against US was unusually strong.

      Delete
  2. I may agree with the arrest but this was probably not a criminal issue and putting her in jail with other criminals and strip search as well as body cavity search were an excess in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ashish, I have read that strip search is a part of being put to jail (so you don't hurt yourself or another prisoners), and also there probably was no cavity search. We will know when the report comes out. I don't know NY laws regarding jailing a person so arrested but agree that some cultural sensitivity would have been appropriate.

      Delete
  3. This is from Madhukar Tanna: Somehow I could not put my argument on the blog! Can you stick it?
    "Based on available facts, I have divided this incident into following categories in the order of priority. Please read them with objectivity:
    1. Legal issues and rights of a maid employed by a diplomat and the contractual terms.
    2. Foreign Policy and diplomacy, mutual recognition
    3. Conspiracy
    4. General public opinion

    1. Legal: since matter has not moved to the court it is very difficul to prove if public prosecutor is write or the defendant. It's going get embroiled in play of legal words and I do not know what will be the outcome. Let lawyers figure it out
    2. If you analyse India and US reaction, it has been targeted mainly on this issue. A letter from PP, unusual, defensive and not supported by state department! and Secretary of State official reaction to the incident expressing clearly regret to Minister of foreign affairs- Salman Khursheed sums up the issue.
    In my view, US failed in acting as friend of India as far diplomacy goes. Either Officials in state department were not aware what PP is upto, or some one in State department has given instructions without realizing its political fall out.
    When US PP issued secret visas for maid's family in India( same visas as prevention of human trafficking )and flew them out of India,to live in US this has infuriated Indian government much more- once again legality will follow later on
    3. Maid driven conspiracy - do not know the facts about what has been written in the contract as both parties are claiming that legally they are right! One view is that prosecutor has made error in interpreting the contract
    4. General public differences between US and India - it's not self esteem on the contrary, it was a national pride, Since President of India was searched and stopped at one of the US airport. Gone are the days when average Indian gets impressed with US, - major source of low self esteem. Today standard of living has gone up so well that there is no reason for India to be subjugated by US or any other superpower - India in itself is now recognized as one of the most powerful country. self esteem used to be low 50 years ago, no more and that has been shown in the forceful way Imdian government has protested it!

    Now one can argue that, so what he was a president? "We are the pillars of equality and we treat everyone same etc etc" - but in reality that is not the case. Even US government expected that their diplomat are treated differently and should be extended usual courtesy beyond the law - India used to extend such courtesy so far, every country does that based on mutual recognition, that is how world moves. If government tires to show how honest they are and how are we following the rules in strictest possible way, I guarantee that every one of us will be at fault at some point or other!
    Finally, most people do not ignore claims of the maid as long as the are legally supported. She has all the right for her wages- this is not the case as simple as human right exploitation - there is more to the case than what has come out so far".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Ashok,

    Thanks very much for alerting me to your blogs again - I do enjoy them for the thoughts provoked and for prodding me to look at my own thoughts.

    You label the group of Indians who were outraged at the treatment meted out to Khobragade as "Indians living in America", and the group with the opposing viewpoint as "Americans of Indian heritage". Well, I consider myself an Indian who used to live in America, but I also hold the opposing viewpoint that what happened to Khobragade was not only just, but the only treatment that could be meted out once she was caught and arrested. Because that is the law! Should she have been arrested? Of course - she broke the law, lied and committed visa fraud, and her arrest and subsequent treatment are a natural consequence of her own behaviour. Note that she herself was responsible for the events that transpired. Not Preet Bharara, and not the maid, Sangeeta Richards! Now some may argue or feel that I am being secretly vindictive since I certainly do not belong to the privileged class, but a legal framework that works for all citizen makes life very straightforward - one is not constantly figuring out what one can get away with! Ambani, Godrej and the rest of their class were equally outraged that Rajat Gupta had to go to jail for such a minor offence as using insider information for trading - they don't have a clue that unfair markets do a disservice to business itself.

    I love India the land, its colorful (in every sense of the word) people, its music, dance, history and philosophy. But I equally love and admire the American legal framework, the freedom with which one can live because of the legal system, the tremendous importance given to individual rights in the American Constitution, the grand scale of everything, business, technology, the great outdoors, orchestras etc, etc. India will get there too as it becomes more affluent, its most deprived get an education, as the Aam Admi Party makes inroads onto the political scene, as our chaiwalla NaMo challenges and gets rid of the old dynasties, but India will get there. India has a long way to go, in terms of developing its democracy - until then the few will continue to manipulate the emotions of the many.

    So while I am an Indian who lives in India, I fully endorse Preet Bharara and the US govt. on this.

    PS: Your prior article (what's in a name) gives us a clue as to what is happening here - the Indians who are outraged have labelled all the actors in this drama, and are consequently upset that this Indian born attorney general is going after one of his own, that it is an insult to India when it is not (the manipulative father of this lady even said that it was not his daughter who had been strip-searched, rather the whole country had been strip searched!).

    I plan to enjoy your blogs once again, thanks!
    Vijay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Vijay for such a thoughtful response. I agree with you 100%

      Delete